I am a proud Briton, and I am also a proud Conservative. Ours is a party that champions the values of personal liberty, democracy and the rule of law - principles that have guided Britain through the challenges of modernity. Yet it is precisely because of my belief in these values that I find Robert Jenrick’s recent comments not just distasteful, but profoundly troubling. His assertion that the grooming gangs scandal stems from ‘importing hundreds of thousands of people from alien cultures, who possess medieval attitudes towards women’ is not only morally bankrupt, but politically unwise.
Such remarks pander to the basest instincts of division and bigotry, undermining the inclusive principles that have defined modern Conservatism. Rhetoric of this kind, coming from a senior Conservative politician, must not go unchallenged.
A Dangerous Narrative: Scapegoating Multiculturalism
The tragedy of the grooming gangs scandal has been deeply complicated by the politicisation of child sexual exploitation. Initially sparked by comments from billionaire Elon Musk through his platform X and subsequently amplified by key figures within the Conservative Party – most notably Robert Jenrick - this issue has regrettably been hijacked for political gain. While such harrowing examples of institutional failure demand justice for victims and accountability for those who turned a blind eye, attributing this scandal to multiculturalism or immigration is both intellectually lazy and factually flawed. Scapegoating of this manner tars entire communities with the crimes of a few, fostering suspicion and hostility of a kind which is unacceptable in a country that has long prided itself on integrating diverse peoples into its fabric.
Jenrick’s language, with its references to ‘alien cultures’ and ‘medieval attitudes’, is no accident. It is a calculated use of populist rhetoric, echoing the divisive language of those who thrive on stoking fear and suspicion, like Tommy Robinson. This kind of rhetoric does nothing to address the root causes of these crimes: failures of law enforcement, social services and community oversight. Instead, it deepens division, further alienating British Muslims who contribute so much to our society.
Consider the reality of Britain’s multicultural success. From the NHS to the arts, from culinary innovation to our Olympic triumphs, immigrants and their descendants have enriched every aspect of national life. Even within the Conservative Party, figures like Rishi Sunak and Priti Patel demonstrate how diversity of background and thought can thrive within a framework of shared values. To demonise multiculturalism is to betray the very ideals of opportunity and inclusivity that underpin modern British Conservatism.
Shifting the Overton Window: Normalising Extremism
Jenrick’s remarks represent more than just a lapse in judgment. They signify a dangerous shift in the Overton window - the spectrum of ideas deemed acceptance in public discourse. His rhetoric lends legitimacy to fringe ideologies, such as the ‘Great Replacement Theory’, which alleges that political elites are deliberately displacing native populations via mass immigration, or something similar. This theory, once confined to extremist corners of the internet, is now being amplified and legitimised by high-profile figures like Elon Musk, whose platform and reputation lend undue credibility to such dangerous myths.
When a senior Conservative politician adopts similar language, the consequences are profound. Incidents of hate crime increase when such divisive rhetoric becomes normalised, and communities that have lived harmoniously find themselves fractured by distrust. The Conservative Party must act as a bulwark against such developments, not a catalyst. For a party that has traditionally thrived on pragmatic solutions and a unifying vision, this flirtation with far-right tropes risks alienating the very moderates and minorities who have bolstered its electoral success.
The Conservative Party’s Identity Crisis
The shadow of Enoch Powell looms over Jenrick’s comments. Powell’s infamous ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech in 1968 resonated with some at the time but alienated mainstream Britain, leaving the Conservative Party to grapple with its divisive legacy for decades. Jenrick’s rhetoric threatens to repeat this error, steering the party toward a far-right cul-de-sac in which it may become entrenched.
Jenrick’s comments should serve as a wake-up call. Addressing the complex issue of child sexual exploitation requires a thoughtful, nuanced approach - one that does not exploit the pain of victims for political gain. The politicisation of the scandal has obscured the long-term, often devastating effects suffered by the actual victims. People across the political spectrum should be united in their shock and outrage at the scandal, prioritising support for victims over scoring cheap political points by pandering to right-wing sentiment.
In an increasingly polarised political environment, the Conservative Party faces a critical choice. It can lean into divisive rhetoric, or it can reaffirm its commitment to the principles that have historically made it a force for good: pragmatism, fairness and respect for individual dignity. Kemi Badenoch must now decide whether to reaffirm these commitments or allow the party to shift further to the right. A party that fails to champion an inclusive vision for Britain risks not only its political future, but also the very ideals it claims to uphold.
Rejecting Hate, Reaffirming Conservative Values
The hateful nature of Jenrick’s comments is not merely a moral failing; it is an affront to the Conservative tradition of aspiration and unity. Such language has no place in a party that seeks to govern a diverse and dynamic Britain. Instead of stoking division, the Conservative Party must lead by example, demonstrating that it is possible to address complex social issues without resorting to the politics of scapegoating.
As Conservatives, we must stand firm against hate, uphold the principles of fairness and justice, and work towards a vision of Britain that is inclusive, aspirational and united. If we fail to do so, we risk not only our political future, but also the soul of our party and the trust of the nation we seek to serve.
Comments