<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cambridge University Conservative Association &#187; sovereignty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cuca.org.uk/tag/sovereignty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk</link>
	<description>The largest, most active political society in Cambridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:16:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fruitcakes, Loonies and Closet Racists&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/09/04/farage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/09/04/farage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callum Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nigel Farage is planning on standing against the Speaker, John Bercow, in his Buckingham Constituency at the coming General Election (BBC). This is unusual in that &#8211; by convention &#8211; the Speaker seeking reelection is unopposed (certainly by the mainstream parties; I believe the SNP fielded a candidate against Michael Martin in 2005). However, I rather [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/09/04/farage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Moral Necessity of Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2008/09/13/on-the-moral-necessity-of-liberty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2008/09/13/on-the-moral-necessity-of-liberty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Burling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following was originally intended as a reply to Mr Gavin Rice&#8217;s post &#8216;On the Inadequacy of Liberty&#8217; but I realised it had become quite long before I had said my peace. Libertarianism does not have to be about defending individual rights, or freedoms, or paycheques. Rather, it is rendered best to me as a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2008/09/13/on-the-moral-necessity-of-liberty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The European Union</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2008/01/03/the-european-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2008/01/03/the-european-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Arthur Sharpe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/2008/01/03/the-european-union/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent European Reform Treaty, it is topical to consider the nature of, and the justification for the European Union. The central point to make here is that whatever justification for the EU that is given, it is either false or not worth it. Indeed, the EU is detrimental to the prosperity of many [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2008/01/03/the-european-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The EU is a pointless waste of money that should be abolished: Why Britain should leave the European Union.</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2007/10/11/the-eu-is-a-pointless-waste-of-money-that-should-be-abolished-why-britain-should-leave-the-european-union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2007/10/11/the-eu-is-a-pointless-waste-of-money-that-should-be-abolished-why-britain-should-leave-the-european-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Hadlow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/wordpress/2007/10/11/the-eu-is-a-pointless-waste-of-money-that-should-be-abolished-why-britain-should-leave-the-european-union/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s very simple. The EU costs a lot of money and has no benefits. In a cost/benefit analysis, there are no benefits. The costs are billions of pounds per year, and more. My argument therefore will not focus on the costs, but demonstrate that there are no benefits. Costs Benefits £5 billion per year cash, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2007/10/11/the-eu-is-a-pointless-waste-of-money-that-should-be-abolished-why-britain-should-leave-the-european-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

