<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic and historical ignorance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/28/economic-and-historical-ignorance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/28/economic-and-historical-ignorance/</link>
	<description>The largest, most active political society in Cambridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 11:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/28/economic-and-historical-ignorance/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1109#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>Nobody gets away with insulting James Arthur Sharpe, not on my watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody gets away with insulting James Arthur Sharpe, not on my watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Hadlow</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/28/economic-and-historical-ignorance/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Hadlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1109#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2009/08/yes-the-market-is-efficient.html 
&quot;The implicit codicil in the claim &#039;markets are inefficient&#039; is &#039;and someone knows better than the market.&#039; 
In the real world, though, that someone doesn’t exist - or at least, is very hard to identify in advance. The notion that an expert can do better than the market is, at best, highly improbable.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2009/08/yes-the-market-is-efficient.html" rel="nofollow">http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2009/08/yes-the-market-is-efficient.html</a><br />
&#8220;The implicit codicil in the claim &#8216;markets are inefficient&#8217; is &#8216;and someone knows better than the market.&#8217;<br />
In the real world, though, that someone doesn’t exist &#8211; or at least, is very hard to identify in advance. The notion that an expert can do better than the market is, at best, highly improbable.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Hadlow</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/28/economic-and-historical-ignorance/comment-page-1/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Hadlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1109#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>I should also add, 

1. Recessions are a necessary corrective measure when resources are overallocated to certain sectors of the economy. The recession occurs during the period of readjustment. 

&quot;By the end of 2005, it should have been apparent that the U.S. economy was fundamentally misaligned. We had significantly overinvested in housing and significantly underinvested in factories, plants, and equipment. In effect, we needed a recession: a period to readjust the balance between the different types of capital.

More broadly, failure is an essential aspect of free markets. Failure shows capitalism is working, because it means resources are moving from bad uses to good uses.&quot; 
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/10/the_case_for_doing_nothing_97382.html

2. Bankruptcies do not destroy assets. When a company goes bankrupt, its assets and knowledge are sold to the highest bidder. Existing bankruptcy law is the sensible way to eliminate toxic debt, rather than the bailouts which have kept it around and thus prolonged the crisis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also add, </p>
<p>1. Recessions are a necessary corrective measure when resources are overallocated to certain sectors of the economy. The recession occurs during the period of readjustment. </p>
<p>&#8220;By the end of 2005, it should have been apparent that the U.S. economy was fundamentally misaligned. We had significantly overinvested in housing and significantly underinvested in factories, plants, and equipment. In effect, we needed a recession: a period to readjust the balance between the different types of capital.</p>
<p>More broadly, failure is an essential aspect of free markets. Failure shows capitalism is working, because it means resources are moving from bad uses to good uses.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/10/the_case_for_doing_nothing_97382.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/10/the_case_for_doing_nothing_97382.html</a></p>
<p>2. Bankruptcies do not destroy assets. When a company goes bankrupt, its assets and knowledge are sold to the highest bidder. Existing bankruptcy law is the sensible way to eliminate toxic debt, rather than the bailouts which have kept it around and thus prolonged the crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The British state should default on its debt &#171; Cambridge University Conservative Association</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/28/economic-and-historical-ignorance/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>The British state should default on its debt &#171; Cambridge University Conservative Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1109#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>[...] they claim, most not even conceivably &#8220;stimulating&#8221;, yet supported by Legion &#8220;useful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they claim, most not even conceivably &#8220;stimulating&#8221;, yet supported by Legion &#8220;useful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Hadlow</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/28/economic-and-historical-ignorance/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Hadlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1109#comment-681</guid>
		<description>Let me add: 

George accuses us of &quot;dumb faith in the efficient market hypothesis&quot; 

On the contrary, of course, us liberals do not believe markets are perfect. Free markets are just individual men and women undertaking voluntary exchange. (And we haven&#039;t even had one of those.) 

In fact, central to the liberal critique of government intervention in the economy is the belief that markets are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; perfect - that they do not clear instantly. The whole problem of government-set interest rates is that they ignore &lt;em&gt;time preferences&lt;/em&gt;. And recessions take &lt;em&gt;time&lt;/em&gt; to fix themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me add: </p>
<p>George accuses us of &#8220;dumb faith in the efficient market hypothesis&#8221; </p>
<p>On the contrary, of course, us liberals do not believe markets are perfect. Free markets are just individual men and women undertaking voluntary exchange. (And we haven&#8217;t even had one of those.) </p>
<p>In fact, central to the liberal critique of government intervention in the economy is the belief that markets are <em>not</em> perfect &#8211; that they do not clear instantly. The whole problem of government-set interest rates is that they ignore <em>time preferences</em>. And recessions take <em>time</em> to fix themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/28/economic-and-historical-ignorance/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1109#comment-502</guid>
		<description>Not only does the Varsity article display a lack of awareness of economics, but, as a history student, I can say that he should spend some more time with reading about the Bretton Woods system. When governments try to run their economies as sub-departments of their finance ministries, the results are rarely positive, and that was what happened in Britain. Unsurprisingly, government after government opted to endure inflation rather than run the political risk of higher unemployment, by pumping more cash into the economy. This culminated in the mess that was the 1970s (although the warning signs were obvious from the mid 1960s) and Dennis Healey taking a begging bowl to the IMF. The man in Whitehall or Washington does not automatically know best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only does the Varsity article display a lack of awareness of economics, but, as a history student, I can say that he should spend some more time with reading about the Bretton Woods system. When governments try to run their economies as sub-departments of their finance ministries, the results are rarely positive, and that was what happened in Britain. Unsurprisingly, government after government opted to endure inflation rather than run the political risk of higher unemployment, by pumping more cash into the economy. This culminated in the mess that was the 1970s (although the warning signs were obvious from the mid 1960s) and Dennis Healey taking a begging bowl to the IMF. The man in Whitehall or Washington does not automatically know best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
