<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Ethical Affairs&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/07/ethical-affairs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/07/ethical-affairs/</link>
	<description>The largest, most active political society in Cambridge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bias in TCS 6 &#171; Cambridge University Conservative Association</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/07/ethical-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Bias in TCS 6 &#171; Cambridge University Conservative Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1004#comment-439</guid>
		<description>[...] The TCS article is essentially a plug for &#8220;CUSU Ethical Affairs&#8221;, who we&#8217;ve covered before &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t consider the possibility that opponents of the campaign exist. Never mind [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The TCS article is essentially a plug for &#8220;CUSU Ethical Affairs&#8221;, who we&#8217;ve covered before &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t consider the possibility that opponents of the campaign exist. Never mind [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Hadlow</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/07/ethical-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Hadlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1004#comment-414</guid>
		<description>&quot;CUSU Ethical Affairs&quot; contacted us to say, amongst other things,

&quot;I wanted to reassure you that it has been pointed out that the questionnaire on the ethical investment section of our website did not have an option to give a neutral opinion. We had a few comments about it, and are looking into getting it changed.&quot;

It appears to have been there since September 2008. Still not changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;CUSU Ethical Affairs&#8221; contacted us to say, amongst other things,</p>
<p>&#8220;I wanted to reassure you that it has been pointed out that the questionnaire on the ethical investment section of our website did not have an option to give a neutral opinion. We had a few comments about it, and are looking into getting it changed.&#8221;</p>
<p>It appears to have been there since September 2008. Still not changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bias in TCS 5 &#171; Cambridge University Conservative Association</title>
		<link>http://www.cuca.org.uk/2009/02/07/ethical-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Bias in TCS 5 &#171; Cambridge University Conservative Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuca.org.uk/?p=1004#comment-374</guid>
		<description>[...] people feel the need to claim offence on others&#8217; behalf? (It&#8217;s rather like claiming to represent people who haven&#8217;t asked for it.) There was a rather over-the-top comment by a student in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people feel the need to claim offence on others&#8217; behalf? (It&#8217;s rather like claiming to represent people who haven&#8217;t asked for it.) There was a rather over-the-top comment by a student in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

